The decision that comes up at every meeting? This time, you make the call.

Without getting everyone in a room. Everyone builds their position on their own, then refines it. You decide with everything your team knows.

  • First session free
  • No credit card
  • No sign-up for your team
The decision

Rebuild or patch?

  1. 6 views in
  2. Decided
  3. Check on Nov 15

Six people. Six calendars. Not one free hour.

Everyone knows something the others don't.

The developer sees the debt. Support counts the tickets. Sales hears the customers. Around a table, everyone speaks from memory: the numbers stay in the tools, and the decision is made on impressions.

It's not your team. It's how meetings work: whoever speaks first sets the frame, and what doesn't fit stays unsaid.

In a meeting

One person speaks, what the other five know stays unsaid.

With Aycoo
  • Engineering“3 fixes since March”
  • Support“9 tickets in 12: Excel”
  • Sales“3 customers asked for it”
  • Product“A quarter's delay”
  • Finance“The contract ends in March”
  • Design“4 file formats”

With Aycoo, every voice makes it to the table.

How it works

Four steps. No meeting to schedule.

  1. 1

    You ask the question.

    With an AI sparring partner, you turn it into a real decision.

  2. 2

    Everyone gives their view.

    Alone, whenever they like, from a simple link.

  3. 3

    The team reads the other views.

    Without names. Everyone holds or revises, without losing face.

  4. 4

    You decide.

    With the gist of every view, and what you agree to give up.

Every participant has their own sparring partner. It questions them to the end of their reasoning.

Nobody ever comes back to tell you whether you were right.

A decision isn't finished when it's made.

  1. Before deciding

    You set the Signal: what we'll look at to know whether it was the right call, from what threshold, and by what date.

  2. When the day comes

    The person you named checks the result, and the whole team gets the verdict.

Signal In progressto check on Nov 15

Export-related tickets drop below 5 a week.

Where we lookSupport tickets
ThresholdFewer than 5 a week
Who checksSupport
WhenNov 15
Signal Reachedchecked on Nov 15
Aycira · AI What do we decide next?

You decide. Everyone speaks freely.

  • Nothing is put to a vote.

    The decision is yours, and yours alone.

  • No one reads before they've written.

    Not even you.

  • No one is scored.

    No ranking, no comparison.

  • Every conversation stays private.

    Only its author reads it.

Method

Decades of research, built into software.

Research on group decisions recommends what each step does. Nobody applies it by hand: it's too heavy.

  • Groups miss what only one person knows.

    Group psychology · Stasser and Titus, 1980s

    2Everyone gives their view
  • Thinking alone first produces more ideas, and better ones.

    Brainstorming research · Diehl and Stroebe

    2Everyone gives their view
  • Separate views, compared then revised, aim truer than an open discussion.

    Delphi method · RAND, 1950s–60s

    3The team reads the other views
  • Judgement only improves by holding decisions up to their outcome.

    Forecasting and expertise · Tetlock · Kahneman and Klein

    The check

For the decisions that drag on.

A question between two options, several roles involved, and an outcome you'll be able to observe.

  • Rebuild or patch
  • Switch tools
  • Switch vendors
  • Build in-house or outsource
  • The scope of a launch
  • What to change after an incident

Not for the urgent, the already decided, decisions that directly concern one person, or brainstorming. A meeting does better there.

€350 per decision. The first one is free.

  • No subscription
  • Same price for 4 participants or 8
  • You pay when you launch the decision

Three meetings of six on the same topic: you already know what that costs.

Ask my question

FAQ

Does an AI make the decision?

No. You decide. The AI helps everyone take their reasoning all the way.

I already have ChatGPT.

ChatGPT answers you. Aycoo gets your team to answer, each on their own.

Wouldn't an anonymous survey do?

A survey collects opinions. Here, everyone takes their reasoning all the way, reads the other views and can revise their own. You get the decision in writing, and the outcome is checked on the date you set.

We already have meetings and Slack.

Neither comes back to tell you whether it was the right call, nor remembers it when the question comes back.

What if it's not a real decision?

The sparring partner tells you before launch. You pay nothing.

How long does it take?

About twenty minutes per person, whenever each one likes, before the date you set.

What if some people don't answer?

Everyone gets a reminder the day before the deadline, and you can nudge those who haven't answered yet. Three views from the team are enough to go on without the others; if fewer came in, you extend the date.

Where is our data?

Stored in France. The details, AI model provider included, are in the privacy policy.

This time, you make the call.

Ask my question
  • First Aycoo session free
  • No credit card
  • No sign-up for your team
Tahina

I built Aycoo because in meetings, the person who knew wasn't always the one talking. I'm walking the first teams through it myself: a question before you start? Write to me.

— Tahina

Rebuild or patch the export?

What is decided

We patch: a direct export to Excel, delivered in two weeks.

What we give up

The export rebuild, postponed. We take it up again if the Signal isn't reached.

The planned quarter-long rebuild became two weeks, thanks to one fact from support.

Decided by Sarah on Oct 8

  • Engineering
  • Support
  • Sales
  • Product
  • Finance
  • Design
Signal In progressto check on Nov 15
What we will look at to know whether it was the right call.

Export-related tickets drop below 5 a week.

Where we lookSupport tickets
ThresholdFewer than 5 a week
Who checksSupport
WhenNov 15

The expected result is defined before deciding. On the set date, you'll know whether the decision worked.

The real disagreement

Everyone wanted fewer tickets. The disagreement was about their cause: technical debt that calls for a rebuild, or one specific need, since 9 tickets in 12 ask for Excel.

What moved
Engineering

Position revised: patch first. The rebuild waits for the first quarter.
What moved it: 9 tickets in 12 ask for Excel.

Product

Question proposed instead: should we rebuild the export, or first meet the Excel need?

Engineering changed its mind after reading support, before anyone defended a position.

Blind spot

No one checked who uses the export automatically: two customers import it every night into their own tool.

→ Sarah has those two customers warned before delivery.

Reservation

The two weeks rest on engineering's estimate, which no one challenged.

What each field brought
Engineering
  • Three fixes to the export since March, each one added debt. A rebuild takes a quarter.
Support
  • 9 of the 12 weekly tickets come from the same need: opening the export in Excel.
Sales
  • 3 customers asked for it at renewal, all of them for Excel.
Product
  • A rebuild pushes the dashboard back a quarter.
Finance
  • The contract for the current export tool ends in March.
Design
  • Customers get lost between four file formats.

In a meeting, support would have said “customers complain about the export”. With Aycoo, its AI sparring partner had it count: 9 tickets in 12 ask for Excel.